I discuss the Ramadi misreporting at Strategypage today.
The MSM is getting the war on terror wrong so often that it's time to ask the hard questions.
Showing posts with label misreporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misreporting. Show all posts
Friday, March 02, 2007
Friday, February 16, 2007
Jemil Hussein pops up his ugly head again...
The AP has decided to try to sneak an effort to pass off Jemil Hussein as legitimate while everyone is fighting over funding for the troops. Curt at Flopping Aces and the blogger Confederate Yankee caught them, though.
I'm still standing by my assessment of the situation, both at Strategypage and here. Again, for the straight scoop, one can turn to Central Command's website (http://www.centcom.mil) or Multi-National Force-Iraq's website (http://www.mnf-iraq.com).
I'm still standing by my assessment of the situation, both at Strategypage and here. Again, for the straight scoop, one can turn to Central Command's website (http://www.centcom.mil) or Multi-National Force-Iraq's website (http://www.mnf-iraq.com).
Monday, January 08, 2007
Jamil update...
Flopping Aces has more on Jamil. Seems he denies ever speaking to the AP. Oh, and he goes by Jamil Gulaim, not Jamil Hussein.
Add this to the air strike that the AP reported but MNF-I denied happening, it's obvious that there is something going on with their Baghdad bureau that needs to be dealt with.
Every answer leads to more questions.
Add this to the air strike that the AP reported but MNF-I denied happening, it's obvious that there is something going on with their Baghdad bureau that needs to be dealt with.
Every answer leads to more questions.
Friday, January 05, 2007
Don't exonerate the AP yet...
So Jamil Hussein has been found - at least, we have the AP's word for it. That is it, the AP (whose veracity is under scrutiny) saying that the Iraqi MOI had found him and has issued an arrest warrant.
Austin Bay is ready to exonerate the AP. With all due respect, I have to say, "Not so fast." There are still problems with the AP's story that go beyond whether or not Captain Jamil Hussein exists.
Confederate Yankee reports that MNF-I cannot confirm this report. Curt from Flopping Aces also explains why the AP remains on the hook even if Jamil Hussein exists. For one thing, how do we know he isn't on the run? He's turned his cell phone off.
Not only that, we have a new AP story which has a discrepancy that needs to be explained. To wit, the AP claimed an airstrike occured in an incident discussed by MNF-I in a January 1 press release. There's just one problem: MNF-I is reported that six terrorists were killed. AP claims that the dead include four members of a family. Maybe four were in the same family, but there's that minor discrepancy.
The second discrepancy is the big one. I have asked MNF-I about the incident in question, specifically if any air strikes occured. The answer from their press desk was as follows:
What does Editor and Publisher have to say about this? I'd like to know how they explain this one away.
Umm... Kathleen Carroll, how do you explain those discrepancies?
Austin Bay is ready to exonerate the AP. With all due respect, I have to say, "Not so fast." There are still problems with the AP's story that go beyond whether or not Captain Jamil Hussein exists.
Confederate Yankee reports that MNF-I cannot confirm this report. Curt from Flopping Aces also explains why the AP remains on the hook even if Jamil Hussein exists. For one thing, how do we know he isn't on the run? He's turned his cell phone off.
Not only that, we have a new AP story which has a discrepancy that needs to be explained. To wit, the AP claimed an airstrike occured in an incident discussed by MNF-I in a January 1 press release. There's just one problem: MNF-I is reported that six terrorists were killed. AP claims that the dead include four members of a family. Maybe four were in the same family, but there's that minor discrepancy.
The second discrepancy is the big one. I have asked MNF-I about the incident in question, specifically if any air strikes occured. The answer from their press desk was as follows:
No air strikes. I have the e-mail on file. I have also forwarded it to a couple of people following the Jamil Hussein story.Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Sir,
No, there were no air strikes.
What does Editor and Publisher have to say about this? I'd like to know how they explain this one away.
Umm... Kathleen Carroll, how do you explain those discrepancies?
Thursday, January 04, 2007
More on Jemil Hussein...
Or is it Jamil or Jamail? It's hard to tell - largely because we still have no proof that this person exists.
And now, there may be more questions about the AP's coverage of Iraq. An AP source is apparently wanted by the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior for questioning. Another reporter, interviewed by INDCJournal, seems to have a bias against the United States.
Editor and Publisher is parroting the AP's line that there is no problem, and that is keeping the story from getting too many legs. One just has to look at Greg Mitchell's "Pressing Issues" columns, though, and one has to wonder if Editor and Publisher can cover this dispute fairly. Mitchell has constantly editorialized against the war. He also tried to promote the highly questionable Lancet study that claimed over 650,000 deaths in Iraq. The apparent lack of interest in exposing fraudulent coverage that seems present at Editor and Publisher is not shocking, given Mitchell's opinions of the war. Clearly, he wants America to quit.
This is not a small matter. Hundreds, if not thousands, of news sources use the AP. The questionable reporting is affecting public support for the war. Clearly, the AP's coverage cannot be trusted.
The American people would be better served if they went to the following sites:
Central Command's newsroom:
http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/newsroom.aspx
MNC-Iraq's new releases:
http://www.mnci.centcom.mil/Releases/default.htm
MNF-Iraq.com:
http://mnf-iraq.com/
And now, there may be more questions about the AP's coverage of Iraq. An AP source is apparently wanted by the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior for questioning. Another reporter, interviewed by INDCJournal, seems to have a bias against the United States.
Editor and Publisher is parroting the AP's line that there is no problem, and that is keeping the story from getting too many legs. One just has to look at Greg Mitchell's "Pressing Issues" columns, though, and one has to wonder if Editor and Publisher can cover this dispute fairly. Mitchell has constantly editorialized against the war. He also tried to promote the highly questionable Lancet study that claimed over 650,000 deaths in Iraq. The apparent lack of interest in exposing fraudulent coverage that seems present at Editor and Publisher is not shocking, given Mitchell's opinions of the war. Clearly, he wants America to quit.
This is not a small matter. Hundreds, if not thousands, of news sources use the AP. The questionable reporting is affecting public support for the war. Clearly, the AP's coverage cannot be trusted.
The American people would be better served if they went to the following sites:
Central Command's newsroom:
http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/newsroom.aspx
MNC-Iraq's new releases:
http://www.mnci.centcom.mil/Releases/default.htm
MNF-Iraq.com:
http://mnf-iraq.com/
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
The fallout from Jamil Hussein
AJ Strata is asking about the "body count" figures. Now, the tallies they have are actually a little smaller than the totals reported by the Ministry of the Interior.
The AP's stonewalling on the Jamil Hussein situation - as reported by Don Surber, a new addition to my blogroll - is not easing suspicions, even though it seems to be paying off.
These reports seem to be legitimate, for now, but it would be easier if we had a name for the source at the Interior Ministry who we could check on.
The AP's stonewalling on the Jamil Hussein situation - as reported by Don Surber, a new addition to my blogroll - is not easing suspicions, even though it seems to be paying off.
These reports seem to be legitimate, for now, but it would be easier if we had a name for the source at the Interior Ministry who we could check on.
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Check Strategypage today...
I discussed the Jemil Hussein situation at Strategypage today.
This is not the first time (see the Strategypage article for more discussion), but it is perhaps the most blatant example of how the mainstream media has been making a royal mess of things. At best, there is extreme sloppiness in the MSM's coverage of the war on terror.
At worst, there has been a deliberate decision by at least some media outlets to mislead the American people about the war. When heroes have been shortchanged by the MSM, and when stories get totally rewritten because they make American troops appear "too heroic", when false claims of Koran desecration and torture are repeated without question - and the record is never corrected outside a small "correction" buried where few will ever read it, something is seriously wrong.
There are two places you can get the straight story.
Central Command's newsroom:
http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/newsroom.aspx
The Department of Defense's website:
http://www.defenselink.mil/
The Associated Press, on the other hand, cannot be trusted.
This is not the first time (see the Strategypage article for more discussion), but it is perhaps the most blatant example of how the mainstream media has been making a royal mess of things. At best, there is extreme sloppiness in the MSM's coverage of the war on terror.
At worst, there has been a deliberate decision by at least some media outlets to mislead the American people about the war. When heroes have been shortchanged by the MSM, and when stories get totally rewritten because they make American troops appear "too heroic", when false claims of Koran desecration and torture are repeated without question - and the record is never corrected outside a small "correction" buried where few will ever read it, something is seriously wrong.
There are two places you can get the straight story.
Central Command's newsroom:
http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/newsroom.aspx
The Department of Defense's website:
http://www.defenselink.mil/
The Associated Press, on the other hand, cannot be trusted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)